Josh,
> In answer to the two year term question. I find that the most
> appropriate middle ground. There are long term projects we have and will
> have in play that need solid points of contact. It will add to stability
> of the corporation, which is important.
Hmmm. Sounds like the ideal, then, would be to go out of the gate with some
term (2 years) with some *easy* way to change the terms later. Note that
"2/3 of the voting membership" isn't easy. Ideas on how we could build this
in?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco