Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: "Release date" for aborted releases?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: "Release date" for aborted releases?
Date: 2008-06-07 21:40:17
Message-ID: 20080607214017.GR16502@alvh.no-ip.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
Tom Lane wrote:
> I am wondering whether to leave the release note pages for 8.3.2, 8.2.8,
> etc saying "Release date: 2008-06-09", or to change them to something
> like "Never released".  Thoughts?

I think a mention in the 8.3.3 notes saying something like "the 8.3.2
version was never released to the public because it contained a bug"
should be enough -- so all release note items should be for 8.3.3.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-06-07 22:13:55
Subject: Re: "Release date" for aborted releases?
Previous:From: Jaime CasanovaDate: 2008-06-07 17:26:20
Subject: Re: "Release date" for aborted releases?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group