On Saturday 31 May 2008 14:48:26 Josh Berkus wrote:
> Dirk,
>
> > <a href="http://www.enterprisedb.com/">EnterpriseDB</a> is a well-funded
> > database startup whose product builds on PostgreSQL. EnterpriseDB adds
> > many "enterprise-readiness" features to the basic PostgreSQL product,
> > including database replication, and much more.
>
> The replication-in-core vs. not-in-core has absolutely nothing to do with
> EnterpriseDB either way.  I think you'd be doing a disservice to your
> readers by implying that it does.   Or with the GPL.  If you want to blog
> about these things, maybe break them up into seperate posts?
>

Adding any feature into core Postgres can have a ripple effect on 
EnterpriseDB, so I don't see any reason not to discuss these issues. I'd be 
more concern about the factual errors in the post (things like "core team of 
seven committers") than exactly where the OP thinks the discussion should go.

-- 
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

• Re: Feedback on blog post about Replication Feature decision and its impact at 2008-05-31 18:48:26 from Josh Berkus

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Shane Ambler	Date: 2008-06-01 05:23:21
	Subject: Re: Feedback on blog post about Replication Feature decision and its impact
Previous:	From: Sushant Sinha	Date: 2008-06-01 02:26:22
	Subject: phrase search

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:	From: Shane Ambler	Date: 2008-06-01 05:23:21
	Subject: Re: Feedback on blog post about Replication Feature decision and its impact
Previous:	From: Josh Berkus	Date: 2008-05-31 18:48:26
	Subject: Re: Feedback on blog post about Replication Feature decision and its impact