| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Dirk Riehle <dirk(at)riehle(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Feedback on blog post about Replication Feature decision and its impact |
| Date: | 2008-05-31 18:48:26 |
| Message-ID: | 200805311148.26975.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Dirk,
> <a href="http://www.enterprisedb.com/">EnterpriseDB</a> is a well-funded
> database startup whose product builds on PostgreSQL. EnterpriseDB adds
> many "enterprise-readiness" features to the basic PostgreSQL product,
> including database replication, and much more.
The replication-in-core vs. not-in-core has absolutely nothing to do with
EnterpriseDB either way. I think you'd be doing a disservice to your readers
by implying that it does. Or with the GPL. If you want to blog about these
things, maybe break them up into seperate posts?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2008-06-01 03:22:23 | Re: Feedback on blog post about Replication Feature decision and its impact |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-05-31 15:14:48 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-05-31 19:01:23 | Re: Overhauling GUCS |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-05-31 18:44:37 | Re: Overhauling GUCS |