| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dimitri Fontaine <dim(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2008-05-30 09:02:03 |
| Message-ID: | 200805301102.06063.dfontaine@hi-media.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Le vendredi 30 mai 2008, Dimitri Fontaine a écrit :
> This way, no need to switch IP addresses, the clients just connect as usual
> and get results back and do not have to know whether the host they're
> qerying against is a slave or a master. This level of smartness is into
> -core.
Oh, and if you want clients to connect to a single IP and hit either the
master or the slave with some weights to choose one or the other, and a way
to remove from pool on failure etc, I think using haproxy in TCP mode would
do it. HaProxy is really nice for this purpose.
http://haproxy.1wt.eu/
Regards,
--
dim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dirk Riehle | 2008-05-30 10:21:53 | Feedback on blog post about Replication Feature decision and its impact |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-05-30 08:56:45 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-05-30 09:11:50 | Re: Avoiding second heap scan in VACUUM |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-05-30 08:56:45 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |