Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Mathias Brossard <mathias(dot)brossard(at)opentrust(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Date: 2008-05-29 20:12:54
Message-ID: 200805292212.55391.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-hackers
Mathias Brossard wrote:
>  From what I gather from those slides it seems to me that the NTT solution
> is synchronous not asynchronous. In my opinion it's even better, but I do
> understand that others might prefer asynchronous. I'm going to speculate,
> but I would think it should be possible (without a substancial rewrite) to
> support both modes (or even some intermediate modes, like DRBD on Linux).

Well, we already have asynchronous.  The whole point is adding synchronous.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2008-05-29 20:14:14
Subject: Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2008-05-29 20:10:13
Subject: Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2008-05-29 20:14:14
Subject: Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2008-05-29 20:10:13
Subject: Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group