Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Date: 2008-05-29 20:10:13
Message-ID: 200805292210.13593.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-hackers
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> The big missing piece is lossless failover.  People are currently
> doing it with DRBD, various clustering things, &c., and those are
> complicated to set up and maintain.

Well, we'll see at the end of this (we hope) how a setup procedure of DRBD vs. 
PG warm standby works from a standing start.  I wouldn't be overly 
optimistic. ;-)

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2008-05-29 20:12:54
Subject: Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-05-29 20:09:47
Subject: Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2008-05-29 20:12:54
Subject: Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-05-29 20:09:47
Subject: Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group