| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2008-05-29 19:56:12 |
| Message-ID: | 200805292156.13976.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Jeff Davis wrote:
> It depends on what we mean by synchronous. Do we mean "the WAL record
> has made it to the disk on the slave system," or "the WAL record has
> been applied on the slave system"?
DRBD, which is a common warm standby solution for PostgreSQL at the moment,
provides various levels of synchronicity. I imagine we could also define, as
need arises, various levels, some of which may be the ones you listed.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-05-29 19:59:55 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-05-29 19:54:03 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-05-29 19:59:55 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-05-29 19:54:03 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |