Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming back-branch update releases

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming back-branch update releases
Date: 2008-05-29 14:41:08
Message-ID: 200805291441.m4TEf8B17689@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Guillaume Smet wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > If you've got any bug fixes you've been working on, now is a good time
> > to get them finished up and sent in...
> 
> Has the s/\x09/    /g patch for psql from Bruce and you been
> backported to 8.3? I didn't see it on pgsql-commiters.

No.  I have not backpatched it because Tom found a problem with my
applied patch and did a second patch.

I am attaching both patches.  The second one is Tom's and I don't
understand it well enough to backpatch it.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

Attachment: /rtmp/diff2
Description: text/x-diff (28.6 KB)
Attachment: /rtmp/diff
Description: text/x-diff (5.0 KB)

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-05-29 14:41:51
Subject: Re: Upcoming back-branch update releases
Previous:From: Merlin MoncureDate: 2008-05-29 14:33:53
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Memory question on win32 systems

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-05-29 14:41:51
Subject: Re: Upcoming back-branch update releases
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-05-29 14:14:38
Subject: Re: Upcoming back-branch update releases

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group