> On Apr 11, 2008, at 10:25 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Sorry, yes, I'm behind on email... :(
> > If MD5 values will be your primary data and you'll be storing millions
> > of them, it would be wise to create your own datatype and operators
> > with
> > the most compact and efficient representation possible.
> If you do this *please* post it. I really think it would be worth
> while for us to have fixed-size data types for common forms of binary
> data; MD5, SHA1 and SHA256 come to mind.
Why do you think it would be worth while?
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-05-28 23:41:46|
|Subject: Re: Creating large database of MD5 hash values |
|Previous:||From: Tarcizio Bini||Date: 2008-05-28 17:54:56|
|Subject: Re: GEQO Benchmark|