Tom Lane wrote:
> I notice that the PGAC_CHECK_GETTEXT macro already contains the comment
> dnl FIXME: We should probably check for version >=0.10.36.
> So depending on what that's about, there might be some other good
> reasons to go with choice #2. Peter, it appears you put that comment in
> when you first added the macro, on 2001-06-02. Do you remember why?
I think that was the first version that worked sanely in general.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tatsuo Ishii||Date: 2008-05-27 21:04:56|
|Subject: Re: WITH RECURSIVE patches V0.1 TODO items|
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2008-05-27 19:59:18|
|Subject: Outer joins and equivalence|