| From: | Yoshiyuki Asaba <y-asaba(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | david(at)fetter(dot)org |
| Cc: | zb(at)cybertec(dot)at, stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] WITH RECURSIVE patch V0.1 |
| Date: | 2008-05-21 14:34:22 |
| Message-ID: | 20080521.233422.1000278277145531989.y-asaba@sraoss.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Hi,
From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] WITH RECURSIVE patch V0.1
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 04:36:30 -0700
> > > I think it's the other way around. The server should not emit
> > > infinite number of records.
> >
> > How about adding new GUC parameter "max_recursive_call"?
>
> Couldn't we just have it pay attention to the existing
> max_stack_depth?
Recursive query does not consume stack. The server enters an infinite
loop without consuming stack. Stack-depth error does not happen.
Regards,
--
Yoshiyuki Asaba
y-asaba(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-05-21 15:23:34 | Re: [HACKERS] WITH RECURSIVE patch V0.1 |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2008-05-21 13:37:37 | Re: idea: storing view source in system catalogs |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-05-21 15:23:34 | Re: [HACKERS] WITH RECURSIVE patch V0.1 |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-05-21 14:25:30 | Re: libpq Win32 Mutex performance patch |