| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Yoshiyuki Asaba <y-asaba(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | zb(at)cybertec(dot)at, stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: WITH RECURSIVE patch V0.1 |
| Date: | 2008-05-19 11:36:30 |
| Message-ID: | 20080519113630.GA26882@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 05:57:17PM +0900, Yoshiyuki Asaba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I think it's the other way around. The server should not emit
> > infinite number of records.
>
> How about adding new GUC parameter "max_recursive_call"?
Couldn't we just have it pay attention to the existing
max_stack_depth?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | cinu | 2008-05-19 11:40:27 | Installation of Postgres 32Bit on 64 bit machine |
| Previous Message | Zoltan Boszormenyi | 2008-05-19 10:30:26 | Re: [HACKERS] WITH RECURSIVE patch V0.1 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2008-05-19 12:37:08 | Re: [HACKERS] WITH RECURSIVE patch V0.1 |
| Previous Message | Zoltan Boszormenyi | 2008-05-19 10:30:26 | Re: [HACKERS] WITH RECURSIVE patch V0.1 |