| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists |
| Date: | 2008-05-08 17:43:54 |
| Message-ID: | 200805081043.54942.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-www |
Matt,
> Patches are an integral part of the conversation about development, I
> think trying to split them up is awkward at best. Do people really
> still think that the potential for larger messages is really a problem?
Well, I for one would need to change my subscription address. This e-mailbox
has a limit of 60MB. I have 5 e-mail accounts, though, so I could figure
something out. In this day and age of Google/Yahoo/MSN unlimited accounts,
list volume isn't quite the problem it once was.
How about hacking together a simple patch tracker instead, as Bruce suggested?
I've never found e-mail to be a particularly good way to track patches.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-05-08 19:11:59 | Re: [NOVICE] encoding problems |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-05-08 17:33:26 | Re: Auto-updated fields |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-05-08 18:07:22 | Re: libpq thread-locking |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-05-08 15:34:39 | Re: Updatable views |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-05-08 18:56:01 | Re: IM |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-05-08 16:55:41 | Re: IM |