Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists
Date: 2008-05-07 14:47:36
Message-ID: 20080507164736.76913774@mha-laptop.hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-www

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Folks, can we avoid posting an email to both hackers and patches
> lists? I understand why people do it, but it is best avoided, I
> think. If you feel the need to keep patch discussion on hackers,
> please post just the patch to patches and a summary to hackers.
>
> Or better yet, have a URL to the patch in an email to hackers.
>
> I think it would be helpful for us to provide an infrastructure where
> people who don't run their own servers to store their patches at a
> stable URL where they can keep updating the content. I did that with
> the psql wrap patch and it helped me.

What?! Did you just propose a patch tracker? Bruce? Hmm. I think I need
to get a new email client, because this one clearly corrupts the emails
I receive ;)

//Magnus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Hunsaker 2008-05-07 14:52:31 Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2008-05-07 14:45:56 Re: alter + preserving dependencies

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Hunsaker 2008-05-07 14:52:31 Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-05-07 14:37:09 [Fwd: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump additional options for performance]

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Hunsaker 2008-05-07 14:52:31 Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists
Previous Message Brendan Jurd 2008-05-07 14:43:21 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump additional options for performance