| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Euler Taveira de Oliveira" <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, "postgres performance list" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Benchmarks WAS: Sun Talks about MySQL |
| Date: | 2008-04-28 20:55:27 |
| Message-ID: | 20080428135527.554f6e2f@jd-laptop |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-performance |
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:40:25 -0400
Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> We certainly can pass TPC-C. I'm curious what you mean by 1/4 though?
> On similar hardware? Or the maximum we can scale to is 1/4 as large
> as Oracle? Can you point me to the actual benchmark runs you're
> referring to?
I would be curious as well considering there has been zero evidence
provided to make such a statement. I am not saying it isn't true, it
wouldn't be surprising to me if Oracle outperformed PostgreSQL in TPC-C
but I would sure like to see in general how wel we do (or don't).
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gabriele Bartolini | 2008-04-29 15:54:44 | No Australian User Group? |
| Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-04-28 18:40:25 | Re: Benchmarks WAS: Sun Talks about MySQL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Radhika S | 2008-04-28 20:58:59 | Re: Replication Syatem |
| Previous Message | Tino Wildenhain | 2008-04-28 19:59:02 | Re: Best practice to load a huge table from ORACLE to PG |