Re: pgsql: Add embedded usage mention to FAQ, per Greg Smith.

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add embedded usage mention to FAQ, per Greg Smith.
Date: 2008-04-25 14:34:37
Message-ID: 200804251434.m3PEYbs27343@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

David Fetter wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 07:58:32PM +0000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Log Message:
> > -----------
> > Add embedded usage mention to FAQ, per Greg Smith.
>
> Any chance we can use the active rather than passive voice for that
> last hunk? I'm thinking something like, "...if your embedded
> architecture requires the database server to run inside the
> application process, you cannot use Postgres and should select a
> lighter-weight database solution."

Good idea, I used your exact wording.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message User Gleu 2008-04-25 16:47:51 pgsnap - pgsnap: New Directory
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-04-25 14:34:26 pgsql: Update wording from David Fetter.