From: | richard terry <rterry(at)gnumed(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: best practices for dumping databases |
Date: | 2008-04-07 03:45:13 |
Message-ID: | 200804071345.13764.rterry@gnumed.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
On the same topic, but a variation.
I use pgAdmin 1.4.2 and am a paranoid backer-upper, ie do it frequently, but
obviously have not been taking notice of the messages as they spin past.
When the database and its schema's have been open and I've been working on
them, I usally then just click on the database name, right mouse click >
backup > enter file name > choose plain > ok, then copy the resultant file
off the machine.
I noticed yesterday that on occasions the title bar window was only showing
the name of either a schema, or even a single table, and to my horror I've
discovered I was often not getting a complete database dump.
Despite going back up and clicking the database name, right mouse up witih the
menu, choose _Backup etc, it was only copying a table or shema I'd previously
worked on.
If I closed the connection and re-established it, then the squence works.
Am I doing anything wrong???
Regards
Richard
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008 11:24:04 am Tom Lane wrote:
> "Mag Gam" <magawake(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > But, what is the correct practice to do db_dumps? pg_dump db should
> > suffice?
>
> Yes, though remember that pg_dump doesn't dump any role or tablespace
> definitions, and it also doesn't think about properties attached to the
> database as such (ALTER DATABASE etc). You might want to use
> "pg_dumpall -g" for those.
>
> regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel SRB | 2008-04-07 20:53:20 | alter table |
Previous Message | Karl Martindale | 2008-04-07 01:40:40 | Postgres -> VB6 |