Re: modules

From: "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>
To: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: modules
Date: 2008-04-03 16:35:31
Message-ID: 20080403123531.617541ab.darcy@druid.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 13:54:11 -0000
"Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> wrote:
> Right now contrib is a real catch-all of various things; it would be nice to
> categorize them somehow. And by categorize, I emphatically do NOT mean
> move to pgfoundry, which is pretty much a kiss of death.

Yes! I have plenty of FTP servers to put up my own open source
projects. It would annoy me if I was forced to use someone else's
development environment. Whatever we do should allow for packages to
be picked up from anywhere. We can use MD5 checksums to assure users
that no one has changed the file since it was tested and packaged.

--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.

In response to

  • Re: modules at 2008-04-03 13:54:11 from Greg Sabino Mullane

Responses

  • Re: modules at 2008-04-03 16:41:57 from Joshua D. Drake

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brendan Jurd 2008-04-03 16:38:12 Re: modules
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-04-03 16:32:28 Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE getting dead tuple count hopelessly wrong

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brendan Jurd 2008-04-03 16:38:12 Re: modules
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-04-03 16:32:28 Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE getting dead tuple count hopelessly wrong