Re: Consistent \d commands in psql

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Consistent \d commands in psql
Date: 2008-04-02 08:12:35
Message-ID: 20080402101235.1e86ca92@mha-laptop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > One question: should \df really list *all* nonsystem functions? Or
> > just the ones that are visible in your search path? I'd be
> > inclined to say the second.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> +1 (although maybe that discussion belongs on -hackers, or even
> -general)

+1. It seems to be what would follow from the principle of least
surprise that this works the same way as \dt does - as close as
possible, that is.

//Magnus

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-04-02 12:35:30 Re: Show login privilege in psql \du command
Previous Message Albe Laurenz 2008-04-02 07:11:59 Re: Improve shutdown during online backup