| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tomas Doran <bobtfish(at)bobtfish(dot)net>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Implemented current_query |
| Date: | 2008-03-28 18:32:27 |
| Message-ID: | 200803281832.m2SIWRC12243@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tomas Doran wrote:
>
> > On 28 Mar 2008, at 17:23, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >> Perhaps we could name it received_query() to indicate it is what the
> >> backend received and it not necessarily the _current_ query.
> >
> > reveived_query() sounds like a very sane name for me, and documenting it
> > as such would allow you to expose the functionality without the possible
> > complaints...
>
> client_query perhaps?
Yea, that is consistent with what we do with other functions.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2008-03-28 18:48:47 | Re: Commitfest patches |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-03-28 18:21:15 | Re: [PATCHES] Implemented current_query |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-03-28 19:09:59 | Re: [PATCHES] Implemented current_query |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-03-28 18:21:15 | Re: [PATCHES] Implemented current_query |