Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] Implemented current_query

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tomas Doran <bobtfish(at)bobtfish(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Implemented current_query
Date: 2008-03-28 18:21:15
Message-ID: 20080328182115.GU7464@alvh.no-ip.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Tomas Doran wrote:

> On 28 Mar 2008, at 17:23, Bruce Momjian wrote:

>> Perhaps we could name it received_query() to indicate it is what the
>> backend received and it not necessarily the _current_ query.
>
> reveived_query() sounds like a very sane name for me, and documenting it 
> as such would allow you to expose the functionality without the possible 
> complaints...

client_query perhaps?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-03-28 18:32:27
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Implemented current_query
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2008-03-28 18:15:46
Subject: Re: Commitfest patches

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-03-28 18:32:27
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Implemented current_query
Previous:From: Tomas DoranDate: 2008-03-28 17:58:33
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Implemented current_query

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group