On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 01:43:25PM -0300, Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
> Eugen(dot)Konkov(at)aldec(dot)com wrote:
> >a column definition list is required for functions returning "record"
> >It seems a BUG
> I don't think so. We can say it is a missing feature. As stated in ,
> record types don't have a predefined structure -- they're placeholders.
I was having a similar discussion with Gregory Stark about this and
hadn't realised that such small amounts of state was recorded with each
> How do you know the row structure before hand? Its structure can be
> changed on-the-fly.
Sorry, I don't understand this comment. Could you elaborate?
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Eugen.Konkov||Date: 2008-03-28 17:06:21|
|Subject: Re: BUG: wrong doc or wrong connectby? |
|Previous:||From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira||Date: 2008-03-28 16:43:25|
|Subject: Re: Redundant explicit field name/types description while
select from function with return type of record|