On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:35:22 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> >>> The \password command appears to be documented in the psql
> >>> reference page, but not included in the output of the \? command.
> >>> Is there any actual reason for that, or should I just apply the
> >>> attached patch?
> > Just to be sure - this is non-backpatch stuff, correct?
> You could argue it either way, I think. Lack of documentation is
> a bug, but hardly a critical one. Since you're adding a string it
> would create new work for translators, but it still seems better
> if the entry is there and untranslated than not there at all.
Heh, that's only slightly clearer than what I had before I asked the
question ;-) But - will go ahead and backpatch then.
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Zdenek Kotala||Date: 2008-03-26 15:47:21|
|Subject: Re: Script binaries renaming|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-03-26 15:35:22|
|Subject: Re: \password in psql help |