Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_dump -i wording

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump -i wording
Date: 2008-03-25 18:04:37
Message-ID: 200803251804.m2PI4bA07117@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > I have developed the attached patch with improves wording for the
> > pg_dump -i (ignore version) option.
> 
> I think this is going in exactly the wrong direction --- it makes
> both the documentation and the warning message less scary not more
> so.

OK, updated pg_dump -i wording, more scary.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

Attachment: /pgpatches/pg_dump
Description: text/x-diff (7.8 KB)

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-03-25 18:05:57
Subject: Re: Text <-> C string
Previous:From: Sam MasonDate: 2008-03-25 17:57:21
Subject: Re: writing a MIN(RECORD) aggregate

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-03-25 18:05:57
Subject: Re: Text <-> C string
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-03-25 17:45:52
Subject: Re: Text <-> C string

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group