On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 02:05:20PM +0530, sathiya psql wrote:
> Any Idea on this ???
yes. dont use count(*).
if you want whole-table row count, use triggers to store the count.
it will be slow. regeardless of whether it's in ram or on hdd.
quicksil1er: "postgres is excellent, but like any DB it requires a
highly paid DBA. here's my CV!" :)
http://www.depesz.com/ - blog dla ciebie (i moje CV)
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Craig Ringer||Date: 2008-03-25 09:34:35|
|Subject: Re: postgresql is slow with larger table even it is in
|Previous:||From: sathiya psql||Date: 2008-03-25 08:42:53|
|Subject: Re: postgresql is slow with larger table even it is in RAM|