Re: Fix HAVE_LONG[_LONG]_INT_64 to really define to 1

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Zoltan Boszormenyi <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Subject: Re: Fix HAVE_LONG[_LONG]_INT_64 to really define to 1
Date: 2008-03-25 00:25:01
Message-ID: 20080325002501.GQ5484@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:

> For genbki.sh, to correctly determine whether HAVE_LONG_INT_64
> is defined, the attached bugfix is needed in the configure.in machinery.
> This way the pg_config.h actually conforms to the comments for
> HAVE_LONG_INT_64 and HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64.

I think this part of the patch can be committed right away.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zoltan Boszormenyi 2008-03-25 00:56:39 Re: Re: int8/float8/time/timestamp[tz]/float4 passed by value, was Re: Fix HAVE_LONG[_LONG]_INT_64 to really define to 1
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2008-03-25 00:23:50 Re: Re: int8/float8/time/timestamp[tz]/float4 passed by value, was Re: Fix HAVE_LONG[_LONG]_INT_64 to really define to 1