Re: New email list for emergency communications

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 11:47:20 -0400 (EDT)
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> > > For how often it happens, its worth nothing: I agree 100% with
> > > Joshua here, but, if Bruce wants to create a list on his personal
> > > domain (which, in itself is a failure point as it requires that
> > > *his* domain is not 100% perfect), it doesn't mean that anyone
> > > actually has to *use* it ... I know I never will, since there
> > > already exist faster, more reliable, contact methods ...
> >
> > I think we need a more centralized contact system than we have now.
> > Personally when I don't get email I am unsure who to contact (because
> > community email is down). The email list was a method to centralize
> > that. The list of possible contact methods listed confirms my point.
>
> This comes back to defining teams which is already being discussed in
> another thread. The people that need to be contacted are the sysadmins
> team but we need to know how. Right now, the only people that know how
> to get a hold of the sysadmins team, is the sysadmins team :P.

My big point is if the sysadmins team is hosted by the postgresql.org
domain, how do we communicate with them when postgresql.org email is
down?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +