Re: partitioning using dblink

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Scara Maccai <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: partitioning using dblink
Date: 2008-03-22 22:05:54
Message-ID: 200803222205.m2MM5sV06603@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


Added to TODO:

o Add checks to prevent a CREATE RULE views on inherited tables

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2008-02/msg01420.php

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> Scara Maccai <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it> writes:
> > I got that there should be no difference... plus, I don't get any
> > errors,
>
> You should have. The system enforces (or tries to) that a view can't be
> part of an inheritance hierarchy, but you seem to have managed to find a
> sequence of operations that avoids those checks. Turning a table into a
> view with a manual CREATE RULE operation has always been a kluge, and
> it's missing a check that the table isn't part of an inheritance tree.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2008-03-22 23:55:17 Re: Postgresql partitioning
Previous Message Douglas McNaught 2008-03-22 21:25:34 Re: Postgres connection error