Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL NetApp and NFS

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Chris Hoover <revoohc(at)gmail(dot)com>, PGSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL NetApp and NFS
Date: 2008-03-21 14:23:45
Message-ID: 200803211423.m2LENjd06173@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Aside from what's said there, I'd note that it's a seriously bad idea
> >> to use a "soft mount" or any arrangement wherein it's possible for
> >> Postgres to be running while the NFS disk is not mounted.
> 
> > Do the docs need updating for this?
> 
> Wouldn't be a bad idea to mention it, if we're going to have a section
> pointing out NFS risks.

Documentation mention added.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

Attachment: /rtmp/diff
Description: text/x-diff (1.1 KB)

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-03-22 01:44:29
Subject: Re: Linux/PostgreSQL scalability issue - problem with 8 cores
Previous:From: Bill MoranDate: 2008-03-21 13:54:37
Subject: Re: PG writes a lot to the disk

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group