Re: pgsql: Add URLs for : * Speed WAL recovery by allowing more than one

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add URLs for : * Speed WAL recovery by allowing more than one
Date: 2008-03-18 15:36:18
Message-ID: 200803181536.m2IFaIm14324@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 03:59 +0000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Log Message:
> > -----------
> > Add URLs for :
> >
> > * Speed WAL recovery by allowing more than one page to be prefetched
> >
> > This involves having a separate process that can be told which pages
> > the recovery process will need in the near future.
> >
> > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2007-12/msg00683.php
> > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-12/msg00497.php
> > <
>
> This TODO item presumes the solution, rather than describes the problem
> that needs to be solved. Other solutions have been proposed also and
> AFAIK nothing has been agreed.

The general consensus from the discussion was that multi-plexing the I/O
was easier and simpler than trying to multiplex the actual recovery
code. Until you can get agreement on a more bold approach, the TODO
remains unchanged.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2008-03-18 16:02:27 pgsql: Wiki page about cvs now lives in the main wiki, the one on
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-18 15:30:59 pgsql: Add TODO URLs for: o Allow UPDATE tab SET ROW (col, ...)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2008-03-18 15:43:45 Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
Previous Message Greg Smith 2008-03-18 15:26:57 Re: CVS problems