From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Commit fest? |
Date: | 2008-03-17 15:32:58 |
Message-ID: | 200803171532.m2HFWwx11683@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > I was thinking of writing something that scraped the archives building a
> > lookup table out of this information. What would be nice is if the
> > X-Message-Id and X-Reference were both put into the regular HTML for
> > future archived messages so that it's more likely tools like Google
> > could search based on them. A brief glance at the MHonArc documentation
> > suggests that could be run to re-covert any existing messages that are
> > still available in order to add to those even.
>
> We are sucking a lot of this data down to the db on
> search.postgresql.org already. Does it make sense to do it there
> perhaps? Is there need for anything more than a unique-messageid-hit? If
> that's all we need, we could easily have an url like
> http://search.postgresql.org/search?msgid=19873987123(at)foo(dot)com redirect
> to the proper page on archives?
Agreed, we just need search to index the message-id line and we can link
to that easily.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mike Aubury | 2008-03-17 15:51:27 | Re: postgresql.org dns problems |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-03-17 15:32:27 | Re: Commit fest? |