Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Contributor List policy

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, bruce(at)momjian(dot)us, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Subject: Re: Contributor List policy
Date: 2008-03-12 04:56:22
Message-ID: 200803120056.22978.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Monday 10 March 2008 21:59, Dan Langille wrote:
> On Mar 10, 2008, at 9:55 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> >> ... there should be two lists, of which you
> >> would definitely be label'd a 'Major Contributor' ...
> >
> > I've been thinking that for awhile.  Core is in a good position to see
> > who are major or minor code contributors, but we are not so well
> > placed
> > to see who's contributing in a non-code fashion.  If there's going to
> > be recognition for non-code contributions I'd be happy to see that
> > be a
> > separate list managed by someone else.  How this all gets presented on
> > the website (one page or several?) is not clear.
>
> I always like to look at how others have done this before.
>

And I am always fascinated how we don't look at how we have done it in the 
past. 

-- 
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Robert TreatDate: 2008-03-12 05:22:36
Subject: Re: Contributor List policy
Previous:From: Robert TreatDate: 2008-03-12 04:49:50
Subject: Re: Contributor List policy

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group