| From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, bruce(at)momjian(dot)us, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Contributor List policy |
| Date: | 2008-03-12 04:56:22 |
| Message-ID: | 200803120056.22978.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Monday 10 March 2008 21:59, Dan Langille wrote:
> On Mar 10, 2008, at 9:55 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> >> ... there should be two lists, of which you
> >> would definitely be label'd a 'Major Contributor' ...
> >
> > I've been thinking that for awhile. Core is in a good position to see
> > who are major or minor code contributors, but we are not so well
> > placed
> > to see who's contributing in a non-code fashion. If there's going to
> > be recognition for non-code contributions I'd be happy to see that
> > be a
> > separate list managed by someone else. How this all gets presented on
> > the website (one page or several?) is not clear.
>
> I always like to look at how others have done this before.
>
And I am always fascinated how we don't look at how we have done it in the
past.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2008-03-12 05:22:36 | Re: Contributor List policy |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2008-03-12 04:49:50 | Re: Contributor List policy |