Re: encoding problems

From: Cliff Nieuwenhuis <cliff(at)nieusite(dot)com>
To: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: encoding problems
Date: 2008-03-11 19:07:40
Message-ID: 200803111407.40621.cliff@nieusite.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-novice pgsql-patches

On Tuesday 11 March 2008 11:41:35 Tom Lane wrote:
> Cliff Nieuwenhuis <cliff(at)nieusite(dot)com> writes:
> > I'm not sure how to ask this question. I have written a function, and
> > with PostgreSQL 8.0.13 I can do a "\df+" and see something like this
> > under Source Code:
> > DECLARE
> > result text;
> > ...
> >
> > If I create the same function on my computer running PostgreSQL 8.3.0 and
> > try the \df+ then the Source Code shows:
> >
> > \x09DECLARE
> > \x09\x09result text;
> > ...
>
> That's not an encoding problem, that's an intentional behavioral change
> in the way that psql formats strings for display.
>
> I guess it's a bit annoying if you were hoping that tabs would be useful
> for pretty-printing purposes. Should we reconsider what's done with a
> tab in mbprint.c?
>
> regards, tom lane

My vote would be to go back to the old way, or at least have that as an option
of some sort. I use command-line psql all the time -- to me, psql offers the
same advantages as using a command-line interface for other work. I find the
extra characters really get in the way.

Thanks for the prompt reply!

--
Cliff

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-11 19:45:01 Re: What is the maximum encoding-conversion growth rate, anyway?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-11 18:15:05 Re: Planning large IN lists

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2008-03-12 08:16:27 Re: [NOVICE] encoding problems
Previous Message Joshua 2008-03-11 17:25:54 simple question concerning plpgsql and SQL Functions

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-03-11 19:11:09 Re: TransactionIdIsInProgress() cache
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-03-11 18:07:27 Re: Patch for Prevent pg_dump/pg_restore from being affected by statement_timeout