Re: Contributor List policy

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Contributor List policy
Date: 2008-03-11 03:22:48
Message-ID: 200803110322.m2B3Mm701963@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Actually, I don't disagree that you should be listed, I disagree
> with merging Contributor and Developer into one ... there should
> be two lists, of which you would definitely be label'd a 'Major
> Contributor' ...

I actually think the "contributor" label is much too vague for us to
use. We have developers, www team, regional organizers, infrastructure
administrators, etc. Everyone of those people is a contributor.
"Contributor" is just too generic, and its us is going to trip us up.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-03-11 03:31:48 Re: Contributor List policy
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-11 03:20:22 Re: Contributor List policy