Re: Contributor List policy

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Contributor List policy
Date: 2008-03-10 22:39:36
Message-ID: 20080310223936.GL8199@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> I think it'd be a bad idea to set up a big bureaucracy around all of this.
> The next step on this road is to create an appeals process to address people
> who've been taken off the list against their wishes.

Don't worry -- there will be a nomination period for judges, and the
community will vote for judges (who gets to vote is something still to
be discussed). The judge's decision will not be final though: you can
appeal to the Appeal Committee (which will be a triumvirate elected by
-core) if you don't like it.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dan Langille 2008-03-10 22:41:45 Re: Contributor List policy
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-03-10 22:35:13 Re: Contributor List policy