On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 12:35:53PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Richard Huxton wrote:
> >> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > David Fetter wrote:
> >>> If you really need to embed an
> >>> SQL engine in a binary, consider the excellent
> >>> <a href="http://www.sqlite.org/">SQLite</a>
> >> or <a href="http://http://www.firebirdsql.org/">Firebird</a>
> > for the purpose.
> >> Just to be fair.
> > sqlite seems much more appropriate for embedding.
> Is it really a good idea to be recommending particular other
> products? And don't forget that the next thing on that list would
> be mysql.
> If we need a FAQ entry on this at all, I'd stop after David's first
> two sentences.
Stopping there seems like a very bad idea from a public relations
point of view. Making the suggestion generic and naming several FLOSS
DBs as an alternative might work better.
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Joshua D. Drake||Date: 2008-03-05 17:48:30|
|Subject: Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-03-05 17:35:53|
|Subject: Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres |