Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres
Date: 2008-03-05 18:53:07
Message-ID: 20080305105307.2bcce254@jd-laptop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 10:30:43 -0800
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:

> I believe there is wording that could be used that would not convey
> that sentiment.

Such as:

PostgreSQL is designed as a client / server architecture and does not
normally embed in an optimal way. Discussion of other product solutions
to the embedded problem is outside the scope of this document.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-03-05 19:17:17 Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-05 18:36:26 Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #3965: UNIQUE constraint fails on long column values