On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 09:41:26 -0800
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
> Stopping there seems like a very bad idea from a public relations
> point of view. Making the suggestion generic and naming several FLOSS
> DBs as an alternative might work better.
IMO, entries last forever, for years and years even after we fix them.
I believe we should make reference that PostgreSQL is not generally
considered an embeddable platform and call it good.
Joshua D. Drake
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-03-05 17:56:01|
|Subject: Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres |
|Previous:||From: David Fetter||Date: 2008-03-05 17:41:26|
|Subject: Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres|