Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: DTrace probe patch for OS X Leopard

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Robert Lor <Robert(dot)Lor(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: DTrace probe patch for OS X Leopard
Date: 2008-02-29 20:49:48
Message-ID: 20080229204948.GQ4673@alvh.no-ip.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Robert Lor wrote:

> Post processing the auto generated header may work, but I think it could  
> be unnecessarily complicated and error proned.

Would it work to name the traces "trace_transaction__start" etc instead?
AFAICS that would cause the macros to be named

POSTGRESQL_TRACE_TRANSACTION_START()

which is not ideal but at least it's a bit more obvious what it's all
about.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2008-02-29 21:02:01
Subject: Re: remove TCL_ARRAYS
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-02-29 20:40:13
Subject: Re: DTrace probe patch for OS X Leopard

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group