Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: We should get active / Wiki choice

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Jean-Paul Argudo <jean-paul(at)postgresqlfr(dot)org>,Koen Martens <gmc(at)sonologic(dot)nl>,Susanne Ebrecht <miracee(at)miracee(dot)de>, Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(at)dalibo(dot)com>,damien(at)dalibo(dot)info, pgeu-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: We should get active / Wiki choice
Date: 2008-02-26 11:36:31
Message-ID: 20080226113631.GN528@svr2.hagander.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgeu-general
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:31:50AM +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:59:29AM +0100, Jean-Paul Argudo wrote:
> >  > > However, if you have a properly configured wiki, with good access
> >  > > control support, you can take that burden from the user and avoid
> >  > > mistakes like that. Mediawiki [...]
> >  >
> >  > Yes, Mediawiki... well, we know.
> >
> >  I don't really know different wikis (and honestly, most of the ones I've
> >  worked with I don't really like). But there is one big argument *for*
> >  mediawiki: we already have this installed in the PostgreSQL infrastructure,
> >  thus it's not an entirely new product that needs to go in. (It's a new
> >  install of one, sure, but it's not a new product)
> >
> 
> That and it runs on Postgres which I think is an important
> consideration. Yuck, dog food :-p

That's a requirement, I thought ;-) at least TWiki does, though there was
some chatter lately about them not being so interested in it?

//Magnus

In response to

Responses

pgeu-general by date

Next:From: Koen MartensDate: 2008-02-26 11:46:08
Subject: Re: We should get active / Wiki choice
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2008-02-26 11:31:50
Subject: Re: We should get active / Wiki choice

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group