Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?

From: Douglas J Hunley <doug(at)hunley(dot)homeip(dot)net>
To: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?
Date: 2008-02-19 19:35:58
Message-ID: 200802191435.58720.doug@hunley.homeip.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tuesday 19 February 2008 14:28:54 Dave Cramer wrote:
> shared buffers is *way* too small as is effective cache
> set them to 2G/6G respectively.
>
> Dave

pardon my ignorance, but is this in the context of a restore only? or 'in
general'?

--
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
http://doug.hunley.homeip.net

Don't let Kirk show you what he affectionately calls the "Captain's Log"

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2008-02-19 19:46:07 Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2008-02-19 19:28:54 Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?