Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?

From: Douglas J Hunley <doug(at)hunley(dot)homeip(dot)net>
To: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?
Date: 2008-02-19 19:35:58
Message-ID: 200802191435.58720.doug@hunley.homeip.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 14:28:54 Dave Cramer wrote:
> shared buffers is *way* too small as is effective cache
> set them to 2G/6G respectively.
>
> Dave

pardon my ignorance, but is this in the context of a restore only? or 'in 
general'?

-- 
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
http://doug.hunley.homeip.net

Don't let Kirk show you what he affectionately calls the "Captain's Log"

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Jeff DavisDate: 2008-02-19 19:46:07
Subject: Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?
Previous:From: Dave CramerDate: 2008-02-19 19:28:54
Subject: Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group