| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | damien clochard <damien(at)dalibo(dot)info> |
| Cc: | pgeu-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Europe statutes : recap (2nd round) |
| Date: | 2008-02-05 09:19:38 |
| Message-ID: | 20080205091938.GH24114@svr2.hagander.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgeu-general |
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 01:10:42AM +0100, damien clochard wrote:
> hi pg-eu !
>
> Let's do another recap and see if we have some kind of a consensus here.
First of all, thanks for doing this work!
> I'm conscious that these solutions are not perfect and that some of you might
> object on some details.
>
> However if you're ok with these propositions ,can you reply "+1" to this
> message. If you're not feel free to respond with detailled
> counter-propositions and if possible the sentences and paragraphs that you
> want to add or remove from the statutes.
+1
My only question: does the quorum rules in any way affect the initial
meeting at FOSDEM, and if so, how?
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum | 2008-02-05 20:22:37 | Re: PostgreSQL Europe statutes : recap (2nd round) |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2008-02-05 08:52:21 | Re: PostgreSQL Europe statutes : recap (2nd round) |