On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 11:28:24 -0800
Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> Id really prefer my company be certified by the community rather
> >> than by a company, despite the full respect I have in SRA's
> >> engagement in PostgreSQL and that we all know their contributions.
> > What would it mean for a company to be certified?
> I'd hope it'd mean that I can have some degree of confidence
> hiring that organization for Postgresql support. No?
> It seems to have very similar benefits as certifying individuals.
> Microsoft seems to have something like that for their
> partners in their "Database Management competency"
Guys, with respect this thread does nothing for us unless it is on the
Joshua D. Drake
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0,
> the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
In response to
pgsql-advocacy by date
|Next:||From: Joshua D. Drake||Date: 2008-02-04 04:06:46|
|Subject: Re: Need 8.3 handout for SCALE|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2008-02-04 03:12:37|
|Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Certification|
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Alex Turner||Date: 2008-02-04 04:14:24|
|Subject: Re: [OT] "advanced" database design (long)|
|Previous:||From: Alex Turner||Date: 2008-02-04 03:49:44|
|Subject: Re: PostgreSQL/PHP Application Server|