Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable
Date: 2008-01-31 15:05:16
Message-ID: 200801311605.18796.dfontaine@hi-media.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Hi,

Le jeudi 31 janvier 2008, Tom Lane a écrit :
> We have *never* promised that pg_dump version N could dump from server
> version N+1 .., in fact, personally I'd like to make that case be a hard
> error, rather than something people could override with -i.

Are you thinking about next major or minor version ? All the same?
Is there some real good reason not to dump say 8.2.6 server with the pg_dump 
from an 8.2.5 installation?

-- 
dim

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-01-31 15:13:50
Subject: Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable
Previous:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2008-01-31 14:55:35
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Better default_statistics_target

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-01-31 15:13:50
Subject: Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable
Previous:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2008-01-31 14:55:35
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Better default_statistics_target

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group