Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable
Date: 2008-01-31 15:13:50
Message-ID: 200801311513.m0VFDoR24185@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> Hi,
> 
> Le jeudi 31 janvier 2008, Tom Lane a ?crit?:
> > We have *never* promised that pg_dump version N could dump from server
> > version N+1 .., in fact, personally I'd like to make that case be a hard
> > error, rather than something people could override with -i.
> 
> Are you thinking about next major or minor version ? All the same?
> Is there some real good reason not to dump say 8.2.6 server with the pg_dump 
> from an 8.2.5 installation?

They are talking about cross-major dumps, 8.2 pg_dump dumping an 8.3
database.  They are saying that should be disallowed.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2008-01-31 15:13:55
Subject: Re: Remove pg_dump -i option (was Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable)
Previous:From: Dimitri FontaineDate: 2008-01-31 15:05:16
Subject: Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2008-01-31 15:13:55
Subject: Re: Remove pg_dump -i option (was Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable)
Previous:From: Dimitri FontaineDate: 2008-01-31 15:05:16
Subject: Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group