Re: [PATCHES] Better default_statistics_target

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Cc: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Better default_statistics_target
Date: 2008-01-31 12:31:45
Message-ID: 20080131123145.GF5145@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Decibel! escribió:

> BTW, with autovacuum I don't really see why we should care about how
> long analyze takes, though perhaps it should have a throttle ala
> vacuum_cost_delay.

Analyze already has vacuum delay points (i.e. it is already throttled).

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2008-01-31 13:36:15 Re: Will PostgreSQL get ported to CUDA?
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-01-31 11:45:55 Re: Truncate Triggers

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-01-31 13:42:12 Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable
Previous Message Decibel! 2008-01-31 07:28:24 Re: [PATCHES] Better default_statistics_target