On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 08:14:28AM -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> I wouldn't trust that library or anything that depends on it if I were
> you. It's been unmaintained for a *very* long time.
Because code rusts when it's sitting around on a hard drive?
Pg.pm doesn't get much attention, I agree, but I've actually never run into
a (n undocumented) bug with it. Also, for simple Perl access for
Postgres-dedicated use, DBI can be a little heavyweight.
In response to
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Willem Buitendyk||Date: 2008-01-29 18:11:38|
|Subject: Analyze Explanation|
|Previous:||From: Tom Hart||Date: 2008-01-29 18:03:29|
|Subject: Re: postgresql book - practical or something newer?|