Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: OT - pg perl DBI question

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: OT - pg perl DBI question
Date: 2008-01-29 18:07:26
Message-ID: 20080129180726.GF26594@crankycanuck.ca (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 08:14:28AM -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> 
> I wouldn't trust that library or anything that depends on it if I were
> you.  It's been unmaintained for a *very* long time.

Because code rusts when it's sitting around on a hard drive?

Pg.pm doesn't get much attention, I agree, but I've actually never run into
a (n undocumented) bug with it.  Also, for simple Perl access for
Postgres-dedicated use, DBI can be a little heavyweight.

A


In response to

Responses

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Willem BuitendykDate: 2008-01-29 18:11:38
Subject: Analyze Explanation
Previous:From: Tom HartDate: 2008-01-29 18:03:29
Subject: Re: postgresql book - practical or something newer?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group