Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 8.2 and 8.3 postgresql.conf oddity

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Harald Armin Massa <haraldarminmassa(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.2 and 8.3 postgresql.conf oddity
Date: 2008-01-23 15:21:30
Message-ID: 20080123152130.GI4815@alvh.no-ip.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
> On Jan 23, 2008 11:50 AM, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> > I just noticed something odd in the Planner constants part of the 8.2
> > and 8.3 postgresql.conf:
> > # - Planner Cost Constants -
> >
> > #seq_page_cost = 1.0                    # measured on an arbitrary scale
> > #random_page_cost = 4                  # same scale as above
> > #cpu_tuple_cost = 0.01                  # same scale as above
> > #cpu_index_tuple_cost = 0.005           # same scale as above
> > #cpu_operator_cost = 0.0025             # same scale as above
> >
> > The "same scale as above" while we have an "arbitrary scale" on the
> > first line is a bit weird.

Do you think it should be "same arbitrary scale as above"?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-01-23 15:22:11
Subject: Re: 8.2 and 8.3 postgresql.conf oddity
Previous:From: Guillaume SmetDate: 2008-01-23 12:39:19
Subject: Re: 8.2 and 8.3 postgresql.conf oddity

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group