Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL Europe statutes : recap

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)gmail(dot)com>, damien clochard <damien(at)dalibo(dot)info>, pgeu-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Europe statutes : recap
Date: 2008-01-21 16:06:53
Message-ID: 20080121080653.09c876c6@commandprompt.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgeu-general
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:00:55 +0100
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:


> > I believe this cannot be left out. I am for 'b'. Companies are not
> > members. Only individuals are members.
> 
> Why shouldn't it be possible to leave it out?
> (And for the record, I'm for 'b' as well, but i'd rather keep it out
> completely)

One reason would be the make it very clear exactly what the expectation
of a Companies influence within the organization will be. If you leave
it arbitrary, is essentially can be voted differently by the board at
any time.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drkae

- -- 
The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
SELECT 'Training', 'Consulting' FROM vendor WHERE name = 'CMD'


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHlMMfATb/zqfZUUQRAudfAKCa0jzYmYRyp1ebxjsQxEEjK6eadACfcJFb
oMlUrQInSAzQH48vy0cdd7E=
=zgov
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

pgeu-general by date

Next:From: Gabriele BartoliniDate: 2008-01-21 16:10:37
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Europe statutes : recap
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2008-01-21 16:00:55
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Europe statutes : recap

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group